Livingston County Sheriff's Office and ICE: 287(g) Warrant Service Officer agreement
The 287(g) Warrant Service Officer agreement between U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Livingston County Sheriff's Office, Michigan, with Appendices A to C, as released by the county. Under it, Sheriff's Office staff nominated by the Sheriff's Office and trained, certified and authorized by ICE may, under ICE supervision, serve ICE arrest and removal warrants on people in the jail at the time of their scheduled release from criminal custody, so that custody passes to ICE; and, when an ICE officer asks, detain and transport people arrested under immigration law to ICE-approved detention facilities (pp. 1 to 3, 8). After custody passes to ICE, a person may be held in the jail "for no more than 48 hours unless" a separate agreement exists under which the jail detains people for immigration purposes "for a reimbursable fee"; otherwise the person "shall be released" (p. 8). The Sheriff signed it July 14, 2026 and an ICE Assistant Director signed it July 20, 2026 (p. 7); by its terms it takes effect when both parties have signed (p. 6).
What the records show
A records note, dated Oct 18, 2026. Every finding below is labeled. Confirmed by the record means the page says it. Working hypothesis means the records point that way but do not settle it. Page numbers refer to the PDFs below.
- Confirmed by the recordWhat the agreement allows.
Appendix A says participating Sheriff's Office staff "are delegated only the following authorities" (p. 8):
"The power and authority to serve and execute warrants of arrest for immigration violations ... on designated aliens in LEA jail/correctional facilities at the time of the alien's scheduled release from criminal custody in order to transfer custody of the alien to ICE" (p. 8).
"The power and authority to serve warrants of removal ... on designated aliens in LEA jail/correctional facilities at the time of the alien's scheduled release from criminal custody that executes the custodial transfer of the alien to ICE for removal purposes" (p. 8).
"The power and authority to detain and transport ... any aliens arrested pursuant to the immigration laws, to ICE-approved detention facilities," but "Only upon a request of an ICE officer authorizing such action" (p. 8).
Under each of the two warrant powers: "Upon transfer of the alien's custody to ICE, the alien will continue to be held in the LEA's jail/correctional facilities for no more than 48 hours unless there exists an agreement pursuant to which the LEA will continue to detain, for a reimbursable fee, aliens for immigration purposes. In the absence of an agreement, if the alien is not transferred to an ICE field office or an immigration detention facility within 48 hours, the alien shall be released from the LEA jail/correctional facility" (p. 8).
Nomination: "The LEA will use due diligence to screen and nominate candidates for ICE training and approval under this MOA" (p. 1, IV.B). Training, certification and authorization by ICE: pp. 2 and 3, IV.C and IV.D. Supervision: "Participating LEA personnel are not authorized to perform immigration officer functions except when working under the supervision or direction of ICE" (p. 3, IV.F). Effective date: "This MOA becomes effective upon signature of both parties" (p. 6, VIII). Signatures and dates: p. 7.
- Confirmed by the recordWho pays.
The agreement makes the Sheriff's Office responsible for its staff's salaries, benefits and overtime, their travel, housing and per diem for training, office supplies and security equipment; ICE provides instructors and training materials (p. 3). The cost section's one reimbursement provision is discretionary: if ICE determines the training "provides a direct service for the Government and it is in the best interest of the Government," the government "may" reimburse training travel, housing and per diem (p. 3).
Agreement p. 3, IV.E: "The LEA is responsible for the salaries and benefits, including any overtime, of all of its personnel being trained or performing duties under this MOA"; "The LEA will cover the costs of all LEA personnel's travel, housing, and per diem affiliated with the training required for participation in this MOA"; "ICE will provide instructors and training materials"; "The LEA is responsible for providing all administrative supplies (e.g. printer toner) necessary for normal office operations. The LEA is also responsible for providing the necessary security equipment, such as handcuffs, leg restraints, etc."; "the Government may issue travel orders to selected personnel and reimburse travel, housing, and per diem expenses only."
- Confirmed by the recordRelease of information.
The agreement says the Sheriff's Office "may, at its discretion, communicate the substance of this agreement" to organizations and groups "expressing an interest in the law enforcement activities" under it, and that, as ICE does, it may give a copy of the signed agreement to media that request one. It also says the Office "agrees to coordinate with ICE prior to releasing any information relating to, or exchanged under, this MOA," and that "Nothing herein limits LEA's compliance with state public records laws regarding those records that are solely state records and not ICE records" (p. 6).
Agreement p. 6, V.C, "Release of Information to Third Parties," including: "It is the practice of ICE to provide a copy of this MOA, only after it has been signed, to requesting media outlets; the LEA is authorized to do the same."
- Confirmed by the recordCompared with Calhoun County's agreement.
The page footers read "Revised 06/04/2025." Calhoun County's 287(g) agreement, whose footers read "Revised 02/15/2025," lists two authorities, serving and executing arrest warrants and serving removal warrants; this agreement lists those two and the authority to detain and transport (p. 8; Calhoun agreement p. 8).
Livingston agreement p. 8: "Participating LEA personnel are delegated only the following authorities listed below." Calhoun agreement p. 8: "Participating LEA personnel are only delegated the two authorities listed below." Footers: every page of each agreement. Calhoun County records, with its 287(g) agreement.
- Confirmed by the recordThe Board of Commissioners.
The county's response says: "287(g) did not go to the Board of Commissioners or any of its committees, no such documentation exists." Each signer "represents it is fully authorized to enter into this MOA" (p. 7). Nothing in the released records shows whether Board approval was required.
The county's October 16 response. Agreement p. 7: "By signing this MOA, each party represents it is fully authorized to enter into this MOA, accepts the terms, responsibilities, obligations, and limitations of this MOA, and agrees to be bound thereto to the fullest extent allowed by law."
Files
On the copy hosted here, nothing was blacked out. This site checked all 11 pages for the names, email addresses and signatures of staff who are not senior officials, public-facing or elected, and found none. Page 7 carries the names and signatures of the Sheriff, who signed for the Sheriff's Office (Michigan's Constitution provides that each county elects its sheriff, art. VII, ยง 4), and of the ICE Assistant Director who signed for ICE. Appendix C (page 11), headed "Public Information Points of Contact," gives the Sheriff, with the Sheriff's Office's address and phone, and ICE's Public Affairs Office. The two email addresses in the agreement are office mailboxes: one for the "ICE Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA)" (page 4) and one for "the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR)" (page 10). The hosted copy differs from the county's file only in removed file properties.
What was asked
- The 287(g) Warrant Service Officer memorandum of agreement between the Sheriff's Office and ICE, listed by ICE as signed July 20, 2026, with every appendix and amendment, and the correspondence transmitting the signed agreement.
- Applications, award letters and notices for any federal grant, reimbursement or equipment program that the Sheriff's Office applied for or received in connection with the 287(g) program, from January 1, 2026, and records sufficient to show the amount and the items of any award.
- Agendas, resolutions, staff memoranda and presentations given to the Board of Commissioners or any of its committees about the agreement, from January 1, 2026.
- Existing reports or data extracts showing, by month from July 20, 2026, the number of people transferred to ICE custody at release, and the number of ICE detainers (Form I-247A) and administrative warrants (Form I-200 or I-205) received.
- Any summary or aggregate report prepared since January 1, 2024 that counts Sheriff's Office contacts with people believed to lack lawful immigration status, including any such report given to the Board of Commissioners. Individual case records were not sought.
What the county said
- October 16: the county wrote that it "has reviewed its files in its possession and located responsive records to your request," and released the agreement with Appendices A to C (11 pages).
- In the same message: "287(g) did not go to the Board of Commissioners or any of its committees, no such documentation exists. We do not keep statistics, and we are not reimbursed."
- It closed with: "After a complete search of the Livingston County records, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, information and belief, the copies of the disclosed records represent the only nonexempt records in the County's possession that fall within the scope of your FOIA request. MCL 15.233(6)."
- The response does not mention the correspondence transmitting the signed agreement or any amendment (item 1), and neither is in the release.
- On item 2 (grant, reimbursement or equipment applications, award letters and notices), the response says "we are not reimbursed"; the agreement's cost terms are summarized above (p. 3). It does not say whether any application, award letter or notice exists, and none is in the release.
- For items 4 and 5, the response says "We do not keep statistics." No reports or data extracts were released. The county's October 12 acknowledgment noted that Michigan's FOIA "does not require a public body to create a compilation, summary, or report of information" (with an exception for state agencies).
- The response was given through the county's online FOIA Center, which requires a login; it is not linked here.
What was withheld
Nothing is marked as withheld: the released pages carry no redactions, and the response cites no exemption and states no fee. The response certifies that the released copies are "the only nonexempt records in the County's possession that fall within the scope of" the request; it does not say whether any exempt records were found. Transmittal correspondence (item 1) and grant, reimbursement or equipment records (item 2) are not in the release, and the response does not mention them by name.
The copies here match the county's files except for removed file properties; file fingerprints for checking are listed here.